AuthorRashad ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
What Port Does Adobe Air Use In Osx10/20/2021
Chromebooks are supported by Adobe Spark.Introduction to Adobe AIR - Adobe AIR for JavaScript Developers Pocket Guide Book Chapter 1. Supported web browsers are Chrome 36 or newer, Firefox 31 or newer, Safari 7 or newer, Internet Explorer 11 or newer, and Microsoft Edge. Perhaps Adobe should focus more on creating great HTML5 tools for the future, and less on criticizing Apple for leaving the past behind.”The Adobe Spark web application runs on Windows 7 or newer, and Mac OS X. Apple recently made public an API to allow OS X software access to hardware H.264 acceleration (albeit such acceleration is only available on chipsets since the Nvidia 9400M–early 2008) and Adobe have already baked this in to a beta preview of Flash 10.1 “Gala”! Update: Steve Jobs himself weighs in on Flash (via Engadget): “New open standards created in the mobile era, such as HTML5, will win on mobile devices (and PCs too). Apple recently made public an API to allow OS X software access to hardware H.264 acceleration (albeit such acceleration is only available on chipsets since the Nvidia 9400Mearly 2008) and Adobe have already baked this in to a beta preview of Flash 10.1 GalaI think it’s about time we got an Adobe category. I think it’s about time we got an Adobe category.I am pretty stoked about it.These changes to Safari to give plugins more access to native APIs will provide Flash with opportunities for much tighter integration with OS X and could hopefully solve the age old problem of Flash content spinning the fans up—Core Animation is hardware accelerated and managed by OS X, so Flash content will appear to OS X in such a way that it can throtle power effectively instead of the Flash walled garden wracking up 100% CPU with no way for the OS to peak inside.Also in minor related news, Adobe were criticised by blogger Chris Messina who keeps a fascinating stream of screenshots of various bits of UI/UX. And that without the requirement of setting any special wmode. Given the now almost perfect integration of Core Animation plugins into Safari I hope that future versions of the Flash Player will take advantage of more capabilities of OpenGL. Yes that’s right: This was and is a joint effort between Apple and Adobe engineers. The addition of hardware accelerated video playback will go a long way to quell continued criticism of Adobe Flash Player being slower on Mac OS X and it was shown that in the case of video, hardware acceleration APIs are available on Windows but were not available on Mac OS X, shifting the blame to Apple.Adobe have also adopted CoreAnimation in Flash betas.The support for the Core Animation drawing model was originally driven by Apple and we have worked feverishly to finish the engineering work on both sides. Adobe AIR is a cross-platform desktop runtime created by Adobe that allows web developers to use web technologies to build and deploy Rich Internet Applications (RIAs) and web applications to the desktop.Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.260 and 14.x through 16.x before 16.0.0.257 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.429 on.I’ll admit fault that I thought they’d never get around to this in a timely fashion, but indeed they have.Adobe have stepped up their game though and are in talks with numerous handset vendors to provide Flash 10.1 across the board. Adobe can and will fix the performance and stability issues with Flash Player and then when the complaining goes away, how many will be fighting for HTML5 because of openness rather than stability?Whilst the iPhone and iPad will not support Flash as long as Steve Jobs roams this mortal coil, the truth is that as of yet there is no handset that fully supports Flash (that means Flash proper, not Flash Lite or Flash 9) so the argument is for intents and purposes, moot. Not so much has been said about the open / close side of the arguments. There’s no reason Flash couldn’t be an excellent product (of which Flash Player 10.1 looks set to be) and a lot of the reasoning thrown at Adobe for the will for HTML5 to replace Flash is simply the current Flash experience.
What Port Does Adobe Air Use In Osx Mac Users WillDidn’t pretty much everyone complain about lack of Flash on iPhone and Android just a few months ago? Have you been living under a rock lately?Sorry if this post sounded like trolling, but I feel that Kroc is trying to sneak in some negative stuff into this article which should really be about one thing: Apple finally have done what Adobe was asking them for years, hence mac users will soon get better “web experience”.News needs to be reported, I am not always the best person to be doing so for all topics, but report it I must as I am an editor and put myself forward for the task.I have never hidden my disdain for Flash, there’s no attempt to ‘sneak in’ any bias, I was actually keeping the bias to a minimum when it came to presenting the facts, and the final paragraphs were my own personal opinion which I expect OSnews readers to discard where they may disagree (and I have no problem with that).I don’t love Apple, I love HTML5. Why is Flash 9 not good enough? Is that a randomly chosen number to disqualify handsets like N900? Just to prove a moot point?Here is some more: “Adobe will have a genuine battle convincing both users that they should be demanding Flash support on their handsets”. The browser war is over,but the runtime war has just begun.The article starts very positive but I feel that the end is a little biased I mean, what the hell does “Adobe will have a lot of bad rep to get over in the HTML5 war” really mean? What bad rep? I felt that Apple was the one f–king up, not Adobe.Also, “there is no handset that fully supports Flash (that means Flash proper, not Flash Lite or Flash 9)”. This will be the interesting aspect to see how Flash competes with HTML5 on user experience, performance and battery life. Adobe will have a genuine battle convincing both users that they should be demanding Flash support on their handsets and that developers should be providing Flash content using Adobe’s tools. As an opponent to Flash (for the freedom reasons, not the stability ones) I can’t see a reason to develop content with Flash and then have to do it all again for the purposes of supporting iPad users when supporting iPad users comes almost free when you’re writing the content in HTML anyway.The reason I mentioned that no handset supports Flash proper is because the iPad / Flash debate has had people defending Flash, yet there is no like-for-like support of Flash on any mobile device of which to point to and say look–Flash is better than HTML5!Again, I hide no bias, I am biased–I prefer open standards and HTML5, but I had to write this news up so I did. Fine, but not really much use when the desktop clients support HTML5.The article explains that Flash 10.1 will be coming and greatly improves in all areas so this complaint should (I hope) be moot within time. And what good is Flash 9 if Flash 10 content is common? That would be like the iPhone supporting only HTML4. That is what I meant.Mozilla disabled Flash in Firefox Mobile on N900 because it was unusably slow. They will have to get over this “flash is crap” mindset just the same as Java had to get over the ever persistent “Java is slow” mindset. It is almost universally hated and is demonstrably awful. ![]() Meaning everyone else will have to hear about how awesome he is for controlling what people can and can’t do his hardware.P.S. The bad part is Jobs has got on his I’m so awesome horse again and most the apple fanatics will swallow it. Back in the days when Apple was struggling to stay afloat and update there aging operating system (vers 8.6), I’d bet over half their developers for OSX were unpaid and in the Open Source community.The thing that is good about this that open standards are being made more attractive to developers. That said there was MkLinux which apple basically just wrote drivers for. Stata for mac torrentThe reason for existence of these bodies is to *drive* evolution, not to chase it. So the first available technology to provide that became de-fact standard.HTML5 is ages far from doing anything specific, except for displaying videos maybe (considering they didn’t even agree on codecs…) and proof-of-concept implementations won’t help.Flash is just an example of how pathetic W3C is. They sure learned quite a bit from it however before switching.The reason Flash became so popular it’s just related to what you said: HTML didn’t do anything specific while people were in need to something specific.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |